Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: James Kaufman <jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:22:29 -0600
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:16:49PM -0800, Dean S. Messing wrote:
Amadeus W.M. wrote:
I don't mess with GUI's much so if you are uncomforatble editing your
xorg.conf, just disregard the following.
Following is what I cobbled together for my laptop for doing just what
you want. (Normally one wants a clone, not an extension of one's
desktop when one is using a projector.)
I don't pretend to be an X config expert but the following does
work (for me). More comments after the code.
Dean
Excellent writeup. Thanks.
--
Jim Kaufman
Linux Evangelist
public key 0x6D802619
CCNA, CISSP# 65668
---
No one ever listened himself out of a job.
--Calvin Coolidge
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: dondi_2006
- Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: John Wendel
- Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: Dean S. Messing
- Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: Amadeus W.M.
- Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- From: Dean S. Messing
- Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- Prev by Date: Re: yum won't remove a package that it lists as present
- Next by Date: Re: SELinux enforcing, an external ntfs-3g mount, Samba and Fedora 8
- Previous by thread: Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- Next by thread: Re: Are nVidia closed source drivers still needed for 2 years old chipset?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|