Re: Anti-spam filters
- From: Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:27:40 -0600
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 19:04 -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
Aaron Konstam escribió:Well some can be done with whitelists, blacklists and rule modification.
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:25 -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
I'm moving some mail addresses from one server to another, and I wasspamassassin + a procmail that calls it to filter your stream will do
thinking about changing my anti-spam system.
Today, I'm still using bogofilter for my personal account, but it would
be nice to have a multi-user anti-spam system which can have per-user DB.
I was thinking about dspam, but I see that there are no rpm, at least in
yum and with some google searching (not to much, maybe I should look a
little more).
Now, what other options do I have?
that. Each user has his own .procmailrc file.
How easy is it for users to update spam definitions with SA?
But the primary emphasis to make SA better is a bayes based learning
proceedure. You tell the system about its mistakes and it learns.
Another tuning factor is the ability is that you can change the value of
the "spam-ness" value that you will accept as non-spam.
--
=======================================================================
We have met the enemy, and he is us. -- Walt Kelly
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anti-spam filters
- From: Tim
- Re: Anti-spam filters
- References:
- Anti-spam filters
- From: Martin Marques
- Re: Anti-spam filters
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Anti-spam filters
- From: Martin Marques
- Anti-spam filters
- Prev by Date: Re: alternative to netstat
- Next by Date: Re: alternative to netstat
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-spam filters
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-spam filters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|