Re: F8 is a problem

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Karl Larsen wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:52 -0700, Karl Larsen wrote:

I had no idea that nvidia was on livna.

Just proving that you pay no attention. You've been told that before,
quite a few times, and even argued about it with those who told you.

That is NOT true! At least do not piss on me for things I did not do. Or,
show me where I said anything like that!

Karl

behold:

http://lists.linuxcoding.com/rhl/2007q3/msg13209.html

in which karl is posting to the fedora list, to a thread whose subject
is, "livna nvidia update problem."

the prosecution rests.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Home page: http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook
========================================================================

Show the whole message rday. Here it is:

lostson wrote:

On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 19:38 -0400, Mail List wrote:


Also - the nvidia-kmod-common is not in cache - and yum install
nvidia-kmod-common does nothing. Having to download rpm's by
hand surely feels not correct ?

Yes this is not correct behavior and I have not seen this before. I am
sure the guys at livna are aware of it and it will be resolved soon. As
long as everything is working on your machine and your nvidia drivers
are working your not going to benefit a ton from these new drivers
anyway. Personally I will just be patient no reason to go downloading
things by hand and working around yum. my 2 cents anyway.


I got the 3 updates again this morning and again they failed due to some problem. It appeared to be a dependent file that conflicts with one already installed. This is not the usual yum update action.


--

Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.


As you see rday I was talking about some update that I was not getting, had nothing to do with Nvidia. That was loston who was talking about nvidia.

As usual rday you go out of your way to show me up and instead screw up.

Karl


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 273
    ... Re: nvidia ... who updates them for new versions of Linux and/or Fedora. ... the few closed source drivers I have used ... Both USB memory drives, and USB hard drives work fine as long as ...
    (Fedora)
  • RE: fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 437
    ... FC2 ate my system ... Changing the JVM that Tomcat uses ... Fedora again it should just work. ... Subject: feedback to NVidia ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 273
    ... Integrated storage solutions such as those that MTI DataServices and MTI Vivant provide to ... Re: nvidia ... who updates them for new versions of Linux and/or Fedora. ... the few closed source drivers I have used ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 273
    ... In this example, the database server must ... Re: nvidia ... who updates them for new versions of Linux and/or Fedora. ... the few closed source drivers I have used ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 273
    ... Re: nvidia ... who updates them for new versions of Linux and/or Fedora. ... the few closed source drivers I have used ... Both USB memory drives, and USB hard drives work fine as long as ...
    (Fedora)