Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??

Some BIG items are being left out of the SCSI discussion...

So allow me to add:

Unlike IDE, SCSI was more geared towards PERIPHERAL integration into computer systems.

with IDE, you can (mostly) only hook up storage devices... but with SCSI,
you could hook up just about anything. Scanners, Network Interfaces, Drives, Tape backups, the list goes on and on becauce SCSI that's what SCSI was designed for.

Now, I don't know if I would say IDE was around that much longer than SCSI as
a defined standard. But, the SASI interfaces and other MF style drives had some
sort of similar setup where the drive was dumb and needed some sort of controller.

I still have the SCSI -> MFM controllers for my Atari's back in the mid-80's
(which when they were cheap for Atari in the mid-80's, that leads me to believe
SCSI was around a bit longer than IDE as a "standard").

In fact, on my Atari, over 1 SCSI bus, I had hard drives, tape drives and Syquest Removable storage as well as CD-ROM's and a scanner. All on 1 system!

Original SCSI was limited to 8 devices (3 bit addressing with 1 being taken up by the "host adapter) leaving 7 more for devices (or other hosts! do that with IDE!)

SCSI Wide used 4 bit addressing (16 devices) and a 16bit data bus effectivly
doubling the data tranfer rate.

In the beginning, SCSI was always faster than IDE because the intelligence of the drives (remember, IDE tends to be dumb as it's controlled by the host), that lent the drives to be more expensive. So think "server" and thus smarter, more expensive also demanded "faster".

Eventually IDE caught up because the demand required it and the scale of production brought the price of the mechs down (which is why they're so cheap these days even though as an interface SCSI is better - but the point is moot
for the typical home/biz user).

Now, I've had machines with multiple SCSI host adaptors (they aren't "controllers" because the peripherals control themselves. The computer is more
a peer in this relationship) where I've had 6 or 7 devices hooked to a single
SCSI Fast/Wide bus.

Good stuff SCSI was. Highly underused but never overrated.

-Ben


--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
======================================================================
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;;;;;USA
email;internet:bkamen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.benjammin.net/
version:2.1
end:vcard

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Strange PEER error with Danis 506 1.81 generic question
    ... First, a really large number of the systems around me are still SCSI systems which use not only SCSI hard drives, but also SCSI DAT drive tape backup systems, additional SCSI hard drives which can be plugged in, but are not normally there, in mobile drive trays; as well as, in some cases actual SCSI CD-RW units. ... The only use there for the IDE interface is another CD or DVD device for read purposes. ...
    (comp.os.os2.bugs)
  • Re: Strange PEER error with Danis 506 1.81 generic question
    ... First, a really large number of the systems around me are still SCSI systems which use not only SCSI hard drives, but also SCSI DAT drive tape backup systems, additional SCSI hard drives which can be plugged in, but are not normally there, in mobile drive trays; as well as, in some cases actual SCSI CD-RW units. ... The only use there for the IDE interface is another CD or DVD device for read purposes. ... But that flies in the face about data I/O speeds, as well as the requirement, as I understand things, that the CD device has to be a MASTER to be used for boot purposes if you are using, for example, the IBM install CD-ROM disks, or a modified version of this technique for custom boot CD-ROM operations. ...
    (comp.os.os2.bugs)
  • Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
    ... IDE was one of the early standards. ... There was a half step between IDE and SCSI called ESDI. ... where the drives plug directly into the frame. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Installed New IDE HD, Now Fedora Wont Boot from SCSI HD
    ... Now the computer wants to boot from the IDE drive, but the SCSI HD ... Linux started with SCSI hard drives so I think is should still work, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Using sysprep on Win2K to unplanned different hardware
    ... > find a DOCS folder and in it are two files that contain ALL of the IDE ... > and SCSI entries that Win 2000 includes. ... The hard disks in the replacement machines will be connected to RAID ... controllers that are not in that list. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment)