Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- From: Peter Larsen <plarsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:58:15 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 11:57 -0800, Les wrote:
SCSI is a serial system, or at least it can be.
Pardon? Usually, when one has a data bus for several parallel data
lines at once, one refers to it as parallel.
Serial - one data line, that sends bits sequentially.
Parallel - several data lines, that send bits simultaneously.
The most usual way of finding SCSI used with drives was as a parallel
bus, anywhere from 25 to 50 pins per connector.
No longer. SAS = Serial SCSI. I can barely get any high-end servers
delivered without SAS anymore. The hardware is cheaper and simpler to
produce than parallel. Also, you have each device on their own line -
just like with SATA. A cable error no longer renders the whole 15
devices useless.
- --
Peter Larsen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHpXQXHbLDna3OFD0RAuUTAJ0WYdpEBJcvl+nziH1FSuw6gSTdeQCgg/0H
947MXz4IxEyDiX+vw/am3LA=
=Zl9m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- From: William Case
- Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- From: Les
- Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- From: Tim
- Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- Prev by Date: Re: fedora 8 - wireless network card for x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- Next by thread: Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
- Index(es):