Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:43:02 +1030
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 16:42 -0400, Mauriat M wrote:
Well I guess I was hoping for the best of both worlds by having my
desktop "act" as a server. Why have 2 machines when 1 will do?
There's lots of advantages in having 2 instead of 1. Quite apart from
being able to leave a simple server running all the time providing
services (public, or not), while you can fiddle all over the place with
your client machine and not lose anything important (because all that
important stuff is actually stored on the server). You've got two
machines for when you have to fault find. It's very handy to be able to
access the net on one machine, when a faulty one is refusing to do so.
--
(This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's
important to the thread.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Valent Turkovic
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Mauriat M
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Prev by Date: Re: NFS problem
- Next by Date: Re: No more hibernate with kernel 2.6.24.3-12.fc8
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Index(es):