Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: "Uno Engborg" <uno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:30:22 +0100
Actually, CentOS 5.1 isn't that bad as a desktop. So you could probably get
away
with using just one machine. The Linux desctop have come a long way, and you
no
longer need to be on the bleeding edge to have a resonable set of
functionality.
2008/3/24, Mauriat M <mirandam@xxxxxxxxx>:
--
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Valent Turkovichttp://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/
<valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> What is your experience ?
The general wisdom from fedora power users is:
- Fedora for the desktop / workstation
- CentOS for the home server or other unsupported server
- RedHat for a serious server or otherwise when support is needed
* by support I mean paid support
Also, SELinux isn't nearly that hard. I wouldn't put a box on the open
internet without SELinux.
Well I guess I was hoping for the best of both worlds by having my
desktop "act" as a server. Why have 2 machines when 1 will do?
Too much to ask, I know.
-Mauriat
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Valent Turkovic
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Mauriat M
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Next by Date: Re: moving from Verizon DSL to Verizon FIOS
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
