Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:43:06 +0900
David G. Mackay wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:07 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
There was a point in mid-FC5 where an update kernel would not boot on an IBM Xseries 225 (fairly mainstream dual-xeon boxes, I thought) without doing a motherboard bios update - after which the older kernels wouldn't boot. And of course there were no warnings about this or much of a reason to expect it to work after doing the bios flash either. And there have been several updates that failed to boot on popular Dell and IBM MPT scsi controllers - even one late into FC6 which was otherwise pretty stable.
I'm not arguing that it doesn't happen. I've experienced a few. The
original post was directed to a fellow who wants to run a home server on
The original post was by valent.turkovic and actually referred to a document written by someone who'd decided Fedora was a poor choice for a server, and invited comment.
his desktop. And, I haven't seen anything yet that would cause more
than a few minutes downtime while switching to the backup partition
after noticing the problem.
Now, if we're talking a system that's handling financial transactions
that has to be available 24/7, then it's another situation entirely.
I've been in shops like that, and am aware of the practices necessary to
sustain that. I don't, however, need a disaster recovery plan with a
hot backup site for my video and music collection.
I would think that a home Linux user running a server controlling his Internet connexion and maybe providing mail and http caching is fairly common. While maybe not life-threatening, its sudden lack might be pretty inconvenient.
_Mine_ is running CentOS4 and is on a UPS (the UPS because used good ones can be bought pretty cheaply at auction).
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: David G. Mackay
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- References:
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Valent Turkovic
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Mauriat M
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: David G. Mackay
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: John Summerfield
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: David G. Mackay
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: John Summerfield
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: David G. Mackay
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- From: David G. Mackay
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Prev by Date: Re: installonlypkgs
- Next by Date: Re: installonlypkgs
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|