Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:33:20 +0100
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 17:58:24 Bill Crawford wrote:
On 15/04/2008, Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW, a while back I had a thread on the CentOS list about being unable
to get user mode working, and I found, as you did, that even after
re-starting samba it still didn't work - but then did a while later.
I've never heard a convincing argument as to why that should be so. HTH
Quite often it is purely down to the delays caused by the "browser
election" process coupled with getting whoever ends up being master
browser to acknowledge that your server exists.
Could be. My preferred master is clearly defined, but I guess that elections
still take place.
It's a bit of an
over-simplification and probably wildly inaccurate, but reflects my
experiences here (where it fails regularly due to someone adding a
machine called "WORKGROUP" to the network :o)).
Hey, I have a user like that - regular re-installs :-)
Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- From: Craig White
- Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- References:
- Samba won't dance
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- From: Bill Crawford
- Samba won't dance
- Prev by Date: Re: iwl3945 improved: led now working!
- Next by Date: Re: iwl3945 improved: led now working!
- Previous by thread: Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- Next by thread: Re: Samba won't dance (more info)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|