Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: "max bianco" <maximilianbianco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:29:18 -0400
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Francis Earl <lunitik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, despite it's legal ramifications... far better to risk your companyI don't know that making it easy to access qualifies as distribution.
to appease users. It's not like it's not available for Fedora, but Red
Hat doesn't risk the future of the company on it.
Google for 'Microsoft billion mp3'
Mark is rich, but that's about 3 times his worth right there... he isn't
licensing MP3 or any other codec for his distro, Microsoft just licensed
it from the wrong people.
Now wonder consider ffmpeg for instance has Apple codecs, mpg2/4 and
Microsoft codecs just to name a few, and ask yourself whether it's smart
to distribute this stuff.
Only reason he gets away with it is because Ubuntu represents such a low
market share that it's not worth it today.
Ubuntu used to say on their home page that they only shipped free
software(OSS) , has this changed or am I mistaken?
Max
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Francis Earl
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- References:
- Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Robin Laing
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Francis Earl
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- From: Francis Earl
- Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- Next by Date: Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|