Re: FC9 - S-L-O-W video



On Mon, 19 May 2008 09:14:10 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Amadeus W.M. wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:15 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Just an observation, on two machines which were perfectly usable with
FC8, after "upgrade" they are really nasty to use in terms of video.
Moving a windows leaves a comet trail of window outlines which take
1-2 seconds to clear, minimizing a window results in a trail of
shrinking outlines, the minimize takes seconds and a few seconds after
that for the outlines to fade.

This feels like vista, in the names of cool features the video has
been made painfully slow. All under GNOME, I expect issues with the
new KDE, but if this is the "improved" X, the code or the default
configuration is aimed at either gamers with $500 video cards or
people who like eye candy and effects so much they want time to
appreciate them.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than
from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot

I'm having similar issues with video in F9. I have an onboard intel
chip that normally uses the i810 driver. I figured it's probably not
using acceleration and glxinfo showed DRI = no at one point, now when I
run glxinfo X crashes alltogether. However if I boot off the Live cd
everything is perfect. That's the weird thing. With the live cd there
is no /etc/X11/xorg.conf meaning that X uses builtin configuration for
my video chip and that works very well. I don't understand why the
full- fledged F9 doesn't do the same.

Also, if I boot in runlevel 5, sound works. In runlevel 3 it doesn't.
Yeah, and there's no sound configuration tool anymore.

I'm downloading CentOS as we speak.

I got reasonable performance with 16 bit color instead of 24. The new X
doesn't seem to know how to make any of my video work well, another
machine with i965 chipset video is also dead slow at 24 bit. Both
machines run fine on FC8, so I guess all the effort had gone into
features, not performance for the people who aren't gamers and have low
cost video (which used to work fine).

I see when I move a window in 24 bit color the CPU goes 100% busy as
long as a move the Windows. At 16 bit iy takes about 30% of the CPU,
more reasonable.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot

I reinstalled F9 but I renamed my old home directory, and re-created my
usual user account anew upon install. I'm also not using compiz for now.
The video is fine now. Hope it stays that way when I enable desktop
effects. Before, I could hardly scroll in firefox.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DOS windowed session not working
    ... this was another seen thing on this 'new' Depot serviced mainboard I'm dealing with DOS VDM irregularities in an earlier thread here. ... I noticed that although the Scitech video configuration window did have all the screen font change options and color depth selection, the monitor selection panel was blank. ... So in reading the complete installation notes for MCP2 that you can get from the help pane in the troubleshooting, ...
    (comp.os.os2.bugs)
  • Re: playing video on second display
    ... Option A (assumes player skin present on monitor, just no video showing up): ... Here's one way to get a video fullscreen on one monitor & the WMP window ... Vista has an updated display model which is more reliant on DirectX ... Possibly there would be similar settings supplied by the setup for ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
  • Re: Opening in a web site
    ... sections (one for each chapter in the video with start and duration times ... chapters on the right side of their Windows Media Player window that they ... >>> code and it should work fine with the newer embedding code above. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
  • Re: CMD/DOS problems
    ... It's downloading. ... That's racing analysis software. ... Can it run in a window. ... > have Video writing options. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Video snapshot is not captured with bitblt sometimes
    ... the paint window around the screen, the image was only an overlay and was not ... than one DV file and the others do seem to render, ... I don't know how other video hardware handle this situation, ... When you pause are you able to capture ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.gdi)