Re: PGP signatures.
- From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 14:22:09 -0430
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 10:59 -0700, Les wrote:
The truly hard part of any secure system is the user understanding of
how security applies to the actual information and the keys. And that
is the most difficult part of all, but I wouldn't call it confusing,
just really detail oriented.
The encryption as such is not hard to understand (given that the user
doesn't actually need to understand it in order to use it). The problem
is key management, as pointed out by the Stanford paper. Virtually no
significant security breaches (that we know of) are caused by someone
breaking the encryption. They always turn out to be problems of key
generation and/or key management. Call it "confusing" or call it
"detail-oriented" it amounts to the same thing: for the vast majority of
users it's outside their area of expertise and they find it hard to deal
with.
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- PGP signatures.
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Bill Crawford
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Patrick
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Todd Zullinger
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Tim
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: PGP signatures.
- From: Les
- PGP signatures.
- Prev by Date: Opengl and F8/F9
- Next by Date: Re: Epson CX7400 printer and FC9 - FINAL STATUS
- Previous by thread: Re: PGP signatures.
- Next by thread: Re: PGP signatures.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|