Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:12:45 +0800
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 23:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:The basic selection algorithm for choosing
the order in which to return mirrors to clients remains the same:
prefer same netblocks, internet2 in same country if on internet2, same
country, same continent, then global, in that order.
That's totally logical, but it's wrong for some cases. Here in Venezuela
there is much better bandwidth to the US than to anywhere else in South
America, so the "same continent" rule is not going to work for us. I
suspect the same is true for some other SA countries.
The same is also true for Asia. I would hope that the "same continent" rule has a tad bit more smarts in it.
Also, for the relatively few people on Internet2 it's always better than
Internet1, at least here. I mean Internet2 to anywhere is better than
Internet1 to the same city.
poc
--
Children begin by loving their parents. After a time they judge them.
Rarely, if ever, do they forgive them.
-- Oscar Wilde
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- From: Matt Domsch
- Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- References:
- Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- From: Matt Domsch
- Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- Prev by Date: Re: Dependency resolution failed
- Next by Date: Re: Hardware browser??
- Previous by thread: Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- Next by thread: Re: Mirror bandwidth and user redirection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
