Re: speaking of grub graphical boot...

Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 11:48 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Just a WAG, but are you using a different color map then the default color map in your images? I suspect that Grub is not changing the color map to match your image. But as I said, this is just a guess.

That should be in the images, itself. The images are 14 colours, it
gets to use them however it wants. Black and white are used by GRUB,
for the text. Altogether, that's a 16 colour image. I would have
thought basic video BIOS graphics could do better than that, but maybe
not.

All the images that I made had their own palette, and displayed in GRUB
the same as they did outside of it.

I am thinking that you may be stuck with the basic 16 colors that go with the 640 x 480 x 16 color VESA mode. I know that the color map is used when you use most image display software, but does GRub honor the color map? Another interesting thing is that the splash.xpm file is not a 16 color image.

Mikkel
--

Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: speaking of grub graphical boot...
    ... Tom Horsley wrote: ... Anyone know what rule I am missing about restrictions ... but are you using a different color map then the default color map in your images? ... I suspect that Grub is not changing the ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: speaking of grub graphical boot...
    ... color map in your images? ... I suspect that Grub is not changing the ... color map to match your image. ...
    (Fedora)