Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 02:00 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, Thomas Cameron <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Alexandre, I've watched you tilting at this windmill for months.
It's
just silly. Someone else called the demand for the FSF folks to
call it
GNU/Linux "childish." I didn't really think so until I skimmed
through
the rest of the thread.

There appears to be some confusion here. There's nobody from the FSF
participating in this thread.

FSFLA, then.

I've never denigrated or minimized GNU's participation in the
success of
the Linux operating system, or any other operating systems.

My point is that GNU is only a *part* of that success. There are
other
projects which have been as or more important in that success. Look
at
Apache and Sendmail and BIND.

Apache, sendmail, bind and linux are not operating systems. They have
never been.

I've never said they were. You are AGAIN intentionally missing the
point and sidestepping. They are part of a DISTRIBUTION. Let me try to
write this in small words so you can understand it. I am talking about
what most folks call "Linux," a Linux distribution.

That people made this silly and childish mistake of renaming the GNU
operating system to Linux is unfair *and* it works against the very
evangelization you claim to support. Nevertheless, you use such
denigrating terms to our movement as Linux operating system and F/OSS.
One gets to wonder whether we are indeed working for the same social,
ethical and moral goals.

Apparently not. I am about getting Free and Open Source Software
adopted in the mainstream, and thereby growing the community. As far as
I'm concerned, I am working towards increasing freedom. We're both
working for the same thing, but you have such an incredibly narrow view
that you will apparently accept no pragmatism.

Those are the services which got Linux in the back door in the
enterprise.

And where would have Linux been if it wasn't running under the GNU
operating system?

/me rolls his eyes. I've already conceded that point. Why are you
arguing in circles?

I'm the first one to admit that without the GNU c compiler and c
libraries,

That's just a small part of the GNU operating system. Linux uses far
more than that from it.

And Linux (as in a typical Linux distro) uses far more of other
projects' code than it uses of GNU. Therefore, to my original point
(which you are ignoring), it makes no sense to call a Linux distro
"GNU/Linux." No more than calling it a "Sendmail/Linux" or
"Apache/Linux." All of those projects contributed to the success of
Linux.

*all* of them came together for the success of what the vast
majority of the community and the industry calls "Linux."

So? The vast majority of computer users run non-Free Software, and
even has it as part or, in some cases, all of their operating system.
Even when it's GNU/Linux. Who's afraid of trying to change the world
for the better?

ROFLMAO - dude, seriously, read what I'm writing. I'm talking about the
call for Linux to be called GNU/Linux. No more, no less.

Look at it from the outside, Alexandre. There are many who feel
that
the FSF's demand for everyone to pay homage by calling it GNU/Linux
is
just an attempt to steal the "glory" of Linus's success.

*If* that was the case, it would just be returning the alleged glory
to the project that most deserved it. The people who most strongly
oppose this correction are precisely those who stole the "glory" of
GNU's success.

Um, hold on a sec, there. "Stole?" To steal typically means to have
the intent to deprive another of property. I've been using Linux since
1995, and I've never, ever seen anyone in the Linux community indicate
that they intended to deprive GNU of any property or even credit for all
they've done.

That the Linux kernel was what accelerated F/OSS popularity was
happenstance mixed with cool code. That the general public saw Linux
distributions rise up in popularity and they chose to call them "Linux"
instead of "GNU/Linux" is not theft, it's just the way things shook out.

Accusations of theft are pretty serious. I don't buy it at all.

But that's not the case. The case at hand is that by rejecting the
idea of mentioning GNU, a very different set of values is promoted.
And this set of values denigrates our movement, works against our
movement, and makes our task, that was already difficult, even more
difficult. Pretending it doesn't, waving it off as childish, that's
what's ridiculous. And offensive. And disrespectful. Please don't
do that.

Ah, OK, I get it now. Yours is the One True Way, and everyone else is
heretical.

Extremism in any form is bad. You're being extremist here, sorry, no
other way to call it.

It hurts the FSF *much* more than it helps.

The goal is not to promote the FSF. If it hurts the FSF, too bad.
The goal is to promote software freedom, to generate awareness about
this issue, and about how difficult and important it is to fight for
it. If you believe Linus and Linux care about these issues, and that
by spreading the name Linux you're helping promote these values,
you've been fooled, like so many others.

Wow - talk about biting the hand that feeds you. Don't you work for Red
Hat, a company best known for... Linux? Wait, sorry, that's not biting
the hand that feeds you, that's hypocrisy. Linus and Linux don't
*really* promote freedom, but you'll take money from a Linux company.
So you're pragmatic enough to do that, but not enough to recognize that
there is more than one way to spread free software? Whatever.

Let it go, man. Just relax, enjoy the incredible success you've
had,

Heh. There's still a very long road until we, the Free Software
movement, can claim any success. Hardly anyone these days can use a
computer in freedom, and that was the goal, remember?

Only those who set a goal such as 'making "Linux" popular' have
anything to celebrate. It's running on something between 1% and 5% of
the computers in the world, and it's soon to skyrocket as cell phone
vendors go "Linux" with full-fledged tivoization. Way to go! (not)

focus all the energy you are wasting in this silly argument on
making
the compiler better.

See, this totally misses the point. The compiler is quite sufficient
already for people to live in freedom. The issues that need attention
now are completely different. Software development is quite secondary
in my personal list of priorities, because it's not anywhere as
relevant any more to advance the goals of the Free Software movement
as spreading awareness about the importance of seeking and pursuing
freedom. So I am putting my energy where it matters the most, and in
the mean time I'm working on technical issues because they help me pay
the bills and support my family and enables me to put my energy where
it matters for a majority of my time.

Now, if you set different goals, if you prefer to not look at the big
picture and cheer for the gains in popularity afforded by sacrificing
the fundamental goals, that's between you and your conscience.

Nothing will gain the FSF more respect and
acceptance than continued success.

Success as measured by "how many people gained freedom", which it set
out to achieve, or as measured by "how many people use a bit of Free
Software without even knowing or caring", which others have adopted as
their own goals?

Please continue to evangelize Free
Software, I am totally on board with helping you out.

That's precisely what I'm doing, while listening to demands for me to
shut up, to drop childish and ridiculous arguments, and to stop
hunting windmills.

Again, I think you are going to extremes. I think that by penetrating
enterprise computing environments (as you call it, 'making Linux
popular'), we *are* increasing freedom. The more people who are exposed
to Free/Open Source Software, the more those people will participate in
the community. The bigger the community, the more penetration we can
get, and the bigger the community becomes again. Apparently that's not
good enough for you, and that's fine. For me, it's great.

Now I'm done with this thread. By sidestepping and redirecting the
conversation or flat ignoring what I've said, you've reminded me of that
old saying about wrestling with a pig. The pig enjoys it and you just
get dirty.

Thomas

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The United States Trying To Get Rid Of UseNet?
    ... But why is fsck running so often??? ... specs to Linux developers. ... I agree Linux' success was unexpected and mystifying to many ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: The alternative Delphi roadmap to success
    ... "only future for Delphi is native code"? ... another 20, we need equal presence of the product in Linux, .Net Current and ... What DevCo need to decide is where would they be in a few years. ... success of Windows 3.x ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Visio alternative
    ... > Chris Cox wrote: ... > enforce KVivio from the get go, I may have better success. ... If you don't require M$ Office compatibility, ... amount of Linux... ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: offscreenrendering works on Win but not on Linux
    ... Win but not on Linux. ... QPixmap ExVs::renderPixmap ... if{return nullPm;} ... bool success = TRUE; ...
    (comp.graphics.api.opengl)
  • Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
    ... > users and good for the success of Linux outside your elite club. ... > GUARANTEE YOU that the success of your version of Linux will not ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)