Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:12:57 -0500
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I like the idea where the update tool notifies the user of important
precautions.
I myself am not on the announce list so it was not a good choice to inform
users of the infrastructure problem.
Why were you not on the fedora-announce-list? Did you not want to
receive fedora announcements?
<snip>
I don't know if th problem is stability or security but stoped updating when
informed of the problem on the test list.
I think the lists should be used as they were described at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate . Anything else would be
dishonest.
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Tim
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Laszlo BERES
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Tim
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Matthew Miller
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- From: Jim Cornette
- Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- Prev by Date: Re: ATI driver on F9
- Next by Date: Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 170
- Previous by thread: Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- Next by thread: Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|