Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:38:54 -0400
Tim wrote:
Bill Davidsen:Suggestion: since the livna key is still secure (AFAIK) let them distribute the new Fedora key and sign the RPM.
Kevin Fenzi:That was suggested before, but it's not a great solution for several
reasons: Not everyone has livna enabled. Having one repo publish keys
for another seems wrong, especially when they are not officially
connected.
I'm not sure whether *also* having the keys on other sites is so bad.
I give up, politics as usual. If a proposed solution isn't perfect it isn't good enough, so trust us.
If you take it like the GPG model - countersigning and cross-checkingWell said. Common sense. The political answer is "wait until new improved RPM comes out."
through other sources that you also trust. If Livna, ATRPMs, and a few
other usual repos had the same Fedora public key, you'd be more
confident that the key you got from what you think is a real Fedora
mirror, is the right one.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- References:
- Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Davidsen
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Crawford
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Crawford
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Davidsen
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: John Aldrich
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Travis Arnold
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Anders Karlsson
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Bill Davidsen
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Secrecy and user trust
- From: Tim
- Secrecy and user trust
- Prev by Date: Re: Decent scanning app
- Next by Date: Re: Can't switch to KDE
- Previous by thread: Re: Secrecy and user trust
- Next by thread: Re: Secrecy and user trust
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|