Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: "Thomas Thurman" <tthurman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:32:28 -0400
2008/9/30 Nifty Fedora Mitch <niftyfedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:30:39PM -0300, Armin Moradi wrote:
So I wanted to know about the public opinions on which one is better,
Read about Mecurial and RCS.
This is a BIG topic.... and you need to disclose the size of the
team and their preferences.
If it is just you.... use RCS.
Out of interest, why do you recommend RCS over, say, svn or git or bzr
for a personal project? I've been using bzr for a while for one-off
projects (which never need pushing to other machines than the one I'm
working on) and it works fine without ever using the distributed-ness.
T
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Nifty Fedora Mitch
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- References:
- Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Armin Moradi
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Nifty Fedora Mitch
- Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Prev by Date: extra harddisk on RAID5
- Next by Date: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Previous by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Next by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Index(es):