Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?

From: "Thomas Thurman" <tthurman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:46:56 -0400

2008/9/30 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>:

* CVS (and RCS) archives can be converted/exported to almost all other
VCS if required.

Are CVS and RCS archives equivalent?

The point which has never let appear bzr attractive to me is it being an
exotic niche => Likely fine for local use, but I would not consider it
as basis for a larger project.

I think you misunderstand bzr. Bzr is a generic distributed VCS,
roughly equivalent to git.

peace

Thomas

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

References:
- Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
  - From: Armin Moradi
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
  - From: Nifty Fedora Mitch
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
  - From: Thomas Thurman
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Prev by Date: Re: who the %^#$ is messing with /etc/passwd ??
Next by Date: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
Previous by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
Next by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread