Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Damian S <dsteward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:38:07 +1000
There is no "better". There is "different".Exactly.
I happily use SVN on my projects which only I commit to. Although I am
the only committer, this code needs to be pushed out to multiple
machines, both public and private.
I'll still use SVN if I get several other collaborators, but once there
are more than 3 or 4 people committing, I'll move to git which uses a
superior model for large numbers of committers.
FWIW, SVN was not designed to be the 'best'.
It was meant to be a better CVS than CVS, and in that goal, succeeded.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- References:
- Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Armin Moradi
- Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Thomas Thurman
- Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Prev by Date: Re: extra harddisk on RAID5
- Next by Date: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Previous by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Next by thread: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|