Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:09:48 +1030
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 02:03 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
I just got the openSUSE 11 Bible and looked immediately for info on
NetworkManager, which I found on page 440. There is stated that NM is
primarily for wireless, while traditional network configuration should
be used for wired networks. Since I have a wired system, NM is
probably not right for me.
You don't have to. If your network is working fine, using it, then you
may as well keep on using it. It's key feature isn't really just
wireless, but in handling using different networks (allegedly)
painlessly.
e.g. Now you plug into your home LAN, later you plug into someone else's
LAN, and you might use wireless, later on. With all that you have to do
is just plug in, or get close to the wireless, and not have to select or
reconfigure anything to use the different network.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- From: Dave Feustel
- Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- References:
- Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- From: Dave Feustel
- Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- Prev by Date: Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- Next by Date: httpd access problems
- Previous by thread: Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- Next by thread: Re: Replace F9 Network Manager with old network initializer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
