Re: Fedora vs RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:27:37 -0500
Claude Jones wrote:
On Fri October 31 2008 1:06:10 pm Les Mikesell wrote:The real problem with this from a user's perspective is that
no version of fedora ever 'matures'.
I have no idea why I'm jumping in to this, Les, but the real problem is that you refuse to accept that some people like it this way, and that if they don't, they have other choices...
There's no problem except the one you continuously create with your endless pugilism
It seemed somewhat relevant to post a view that I think represents the 99.something% of computer users that don't use fedora (and my own experience) in the context of a question about a choice between fedora or something else. Sorry if it upsets the closed minority here, but I liked the way RH development worked in the old days up through RH 7.3 where there was a continuous transition toward stability within a major version.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- References:
- Fedora vs RedHat
- From: kevin kempter
- Re: Fedora vs RedHat
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Fedora vs RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Fedora vs RedHat
- From: Claude Jones
- Fedora vs RedHat
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 9 32 or 64 Bit - Which One?
- Next by Date: Re: Fedora 9 32 or 64 Bit - Which One?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora vs RedHat
- Next by thread: Firefox Font Rendering
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|