Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: lanas <lanas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:43:31 -0500
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:47:25 -0300,
"Marcelo Magno T. Sales" <mmtsales@xxxxxxxxx> wrote :
It seems that, for using static IP address, it's indeed better to use
the old network daemon than NetworkManager. I had the same problem
too and have read many, many reports of similar ones on the net.
That's good to know. I'm using the company's DHCP now but might
allocate a static IP.
What's the good of a new manager if it doesn't do all aspects of the
job right ? There's enough managers out there whose focus are
about their 3-door garage homes instead of their work. That one might
not have a 3-door garage home, but what's the use of putting it in the
job's seat if he can't do it all ? Ridiculous. Send it back to studies
and offline practice and we'll see in a couple of years. If nobody
else shows up, that is ;-)
Cheers.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Tom Horsley
- Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- References:
- F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Andre Costa
- Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Marcelo Magno T. Sales
- F10: too many Network headaches
- Prev by Date: Why can't I select the Sun Java VM ?
- Next by Date: Re: Creating a F10 respin
- Previous by thread: Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- Next by thread: Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- Index(es):