Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0500
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:43:31 -0500
lanas <lanas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's the good of a new manager if it doesn't do all aspects of the
job right ?
Yea, I never understood where the insane desire to rewrite everything
from scratch came from (making it incompatible in the process).
If I were doing it, I would have left the existing network service
in change and put a layer on top of it that could stop the network,
swap in new definitions, and start it up again. 100% backward compatible
because the core implementation didn't change, and if you aren't
flitting about from hot spot to hot spot, nothing at all changes.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- References:
- F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Andre Costa
- Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: Marcelo Magno T. Sales
- Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- From: lanas
- F10: too many Network headaches
- Prev by Date: Re: The gpg wizard
- Next by Date: Re: Why can't I select the Sun Java VM ?
- Previous by thread: Re: F10: too many Network headaches
- Next by thread: Could someone test Eclipse for me ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
