Re: packagekit
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:27:55 -0500
Alex Makhlin wrote:
N. James Bridge wrote:I have complaints about Fedora, but lack of dedication is not one. They were there over the four day US holiday (at least enough to cover problems), they fix things quickly, etc. I do wish that things got at least a little testing between updates-testing and release, and that would prevent some of the recent SElinux and dbus access and permissions learning experiences.Packagekit has started to give this error message:Look, I feel for you man! After the latest updates its been a bit crazy. It seems to me that Fedora's team (aka Readhat Enterprise developers) have let us down quite a bit! Look, if we are going to be their QA team so they can make some great $$ from their Enterprise distribution then they should get their act together.
failed to get a TID: A security policy in place prevents this sender
from sending this message to this recipient, see message bus
configuration file (rejected message had interface
"org.freedesktop.PackageKit.Transaction" member "SetLocale" error name
"(unset)" destination "org.freedesktop.PackageKit") (0)
It appears for any request; the actual package does not seem to matter.
The list of repos is apparently empty.
However, yum prints the repo list as expected and installs packages
correctly, though it does add a similar message at the end of the
transaction.
Problem started when I downloaded and installed the latest version of
GRAMPS from this site:
http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/gramps-3.0.4-2jv.fc10.noarch.rpm
What's going on and how can I fix it!?
James
We are now into the holidays, how many Readhat engineers are still available until January? Not that many! In my opinion we have a long wait to go before they fix their problems and ours. By the way, I would like to use Readhat Enterprise instead of Fedora but at what $$?
This one was a special case, not intended to go out so quickly, but a policy change would be welcome, to assure testing of new packages, at least for obvious things like permissions, missing requirements, and "won't even ____ing boot!" cases.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: packagekit
- From: Jeff Spaleta
- Re: packagekit
- References:
- packagekit
- From: N. James Bridge
- Re: packagekit
- From: Alex Makhlin
- packagekit
- Prev by Date: Re: Looks gnome-packagekit dependency is broken
- Next by Date: Re: Some people mis interpret Fedora's Mission Statement.
- Previous by thread: Re: packagekit
- Next by thread: Re: packagekit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|