Re: PackageKit major annoyances

Richard Hughes wrote:
Or add a filter to only show the packages of your architecture.

You probably need to file a bug about this. I normally add exactarch=1
in my yum.conf file, and I might even argue we should do this my
default.

Then how would a user install a multilib they need without dropping to a
terminal?

This really needs to be an optional filter in the GUI, not a systemwide
default.

Kevin Kofler

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Hikaru
    ... so which is more useful in practice, NX or ASLR? ... [oh well, someone could argue, not having bug at all.] ... BTW, I don't like the statement in the paper which basically considers the ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities
    ... >and release it to the public free of charge. ... I didn't see him argue that. ... the best bug-disclosure policy to follow is an optimization problem, ... For any given bug, there may be probably multiple approaches ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Ctrl+Y invokes Delete Current Line instead of Redo...
    ... Ctrl+Shift+Z as Redo. ... and it's just an afterthought for the designers. ... One could argue that it's not a bug. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Package kit notification of uprade available
    ... On 7/20/2009 3:32 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: ... but I cannot figure out how to file a bug anymore. ... It used to be that you could take a circuitous route to get to a page that would allow you file a bug on red hat bugzilla, but clicking on the 'file a new bug' link takes me to a page that has vaguely described search fields - vague in that it's not clear what you're supposed to search on and there's no explanation - entering the exact words you suggested took me to a failed to find page with no clue as to what to do next...there are no instructions, vaguely defined fields, and inscrutable results. ... But, if there's anyone you can pass this complaint along to, or if someone can point out to me the big obvious solution that's staring me in the face and I'm just blocking on, I would be glad to file a bug. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: poll() in 2.6 and beyond
    ... >> are being quashed by those who just like to argue. ... I think you wrote some code that shows the bug you have. ... > See if that fixes anything. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)