Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:51:22 +1030
Tim:
It seems strange to think that a system will swap just because there's
swap space available.
Gordon Messmer:
No where did I suggest that.
I know that you were already arguing against that point, in the rest of
your posting. But I did think it odd that *that* point of view ever
came to be, in the first place.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- References:
- Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Rahul Tidke
- Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Paulo Cavalcanti
- Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Rick Stevens
- Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Tim
- Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Ideal Swap Partition Size
- Prev by Date: Re: eth0 not working - fine in Windows
- Next by Date: Re: Printers
- Previous by thread: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- Next by thread: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading