Re: serious virtualization without HW support?



Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm reading the section on CPU virtualization extensions here:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Quick_Start

and it occurs to me to ask whether anyone would want to get
*seriously* into virtualization without having machines with those
extensions.

is it safe to say that, by now, most modern systems come with VT or
AMD-V support? and by "serious" virtualization, i don't mean someone
downloading and goofing around with it, i mean people who want to set
up virtual corporate servers or mission-critical stuff.

thoughts?

For running Linux machines, there's nothing wrong with using xen, and it probably runs faster than hardware virtualization. For non-Linux I would pass on emulation.

There's nothing wrong with it, I know a few web hosting operations which still use xen. If Fedora supported xen I would probably use it on some available hardware, I just don't feel like going back to the days of building and updating my own kernels all the time.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines