Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:55:20 -0600
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:37 -0700
Craig White wrote:
fwiw - I have found the AdobeReader plugin to Firefox far more hostile
than the Flash plugin and the latest versions on i386 seem to be a bit
better behaved. In the past, I have removed the plugin
from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (nppdf.so) and found that a much better
solution but you need to repeat that each time you install an
AdobeReader update.
I agree, and I do exactly the same thing here.
Have you noticed dead-dog slow printing with acroread 9? acroread 8 prints in
a few seconds on a HP5100 printer; acroread 9 takes ten minutes or more to
print the same page.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- From: Craig White
- Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- References:
- Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- From: Hugh Caley
- Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- From: Frank Cox
- Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- From: Craig White
- Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- Prev by Date: Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- Next by Date: Display Resolution Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- Next by thread: Re: Firefox 3 hogging 90% CPU, can anything be done about this?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|