Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- From: David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:34:58 -0400
On 5/14/2009 5:52 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:40:07 +0200 (CEST)
Johan Swensson wrote:
Port 25 is also used for receiving mail.
My guess is your ISP blocked port 25 for incoming connections due to someone using your postfix for relaying spam.
Nope, I don't have port 25 open on my router, I'm sure there can't
be any incoming traffic. And since last night I've had a perl script
monitoring my router's output log looking for port 25 activity
and it hasn't seen any so far (except the one time I tried
to connect to work just to make sure it showed up in the log).
More and more, I suspect comcast is just making stuff up
to justify blocking port 25 (which is odd since they
don't really need any justification :-).
Comcast stopped using port 25 for their smtp and not uses port 587. And
they did say it was to do as suggested. To stop spam relays.
--
David
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- From: Tom Horsley
- Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- References:
- Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- From: Johan Swensson
- Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- From: Tom Horsley
- Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- Prev by Date: Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- Next by Date: RE: if no NFS server clients are waiting..
- Previous by thread: Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- Next by thread: Re: comcast, port 25, and postfix?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|