Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:29:43 +0800
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 15:08:59 +0800,I think you miss my point....
Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why your email client seems to be ignoring the
"Reply-To:" in this list mails. I'm "trained" to only use "Reply" with
this and other mailing lists and only just noticed that doing so
resulted in a "To:" to you only and I had to manually adjust.
That isn't the correct way to do things. Reply is supposed to reply just
to the to address (or the reply-to address if that is present). To reply
to the list, you either want to do reply to all or reply to list. There
are disagreements on what is best there.
If you look at the emails "From" me they show...
From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
And when you reply to that....I'm seeing...
To: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Which isn't what it should be and certainly not what happens with the
vast majority of posters..
You are probably getting a copy directly from me instead of through theWell.... All I know is that yours is the only email/poster where I've
list. I think some of the fedora lists break reply-to by putting the
list address in there, which you really aren't supposed to do. When I
find lists like that, I often have a filter remove the broken reply-to
headers. Unfortunately when this is done on a list wide basis it will
break things for the people that have configured their clients to use
reply-to to direct replies back on to the lists in all cases.
(mail-followup-to is a better way to do this.)
I'll try to remember to go back and check the configuration of the various
fedora lists to see which ones if any, mung reply-to headers and make sure
I am not removing reply-to headers from any lists that aren't munging
the headers. The last time I looked was several years ago.
seen this behavior in a very long time.... So, I am more inclined to
expect your end as being the problem....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- References:
- Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Steven W. Orr
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Steven W. Orr
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- Prev by Date: Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- Next by Date: Major problem with FC10 -> FC11 upgrade
- Previous by thread: Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- Next by thread: Re: Setup of DNS caching name server for home server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|