Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- From: Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:37:29 +0200
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:27 -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-11-05 09:31:45, Raymond C. Rodgers wrote:
Up until this past weekend, I stayed on Fedora 10 because the closed...
fglrx drivers were stable and functioning, and I didn't want to go
ran into a brick wall....
In the mean time, does anyone have a clue what might be going on?
Have you tried booting with the "nomodeset" kernel param?
FWIW, I've tried both "nomodeset" and "nopat" on my 4830 with no effect.
I downgraded to Catalyst 9.8.
See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900
Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- From: Paul W. Frields
- Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- References:
- Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- From: Tony Nelson
- Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- Prev by Date: Re: Tomcat6 docs
- Next by Date: Re: No nightly builds?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora 11 x86_64, ATI HD4870, and RPM Fusion's Catalyst Drivers...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|