Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:13:53 -0430
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I back up all of /etc and /usr/local. Also /opt if it exists.
Is /opt really likely to contain some configuration information
that a reinstall wouldn't set up? ISTM that, if the system
is "modern" enough to use /opt for its install, then its config
would also be in /var. Not so?
/opt (and /usr/local) are likely to contain stuff that wasn't installed
via rpm or yum, thus needs to be preserved. That's all. YMMV.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Craig White
- Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- References:
- Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Stuart McGraw
- Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- From: Mike McCarty
- Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- Prev by Date: Re: readline + binding; still frustrated after 4 yrs of trying
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb
- Previous by thread: Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- Next by thread: Re: Backup, what system files are *really* important?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|