Re: chainloader +1, again
- From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:48:47 -0400
On Monday 22 March 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:28:46 -0400, Gene wrote:I played with that some on the f12 disk, and yes, f10's device map is in
So I booted normally to F10 & kernel 2.6.34-rc2, and I have now tried
to add a chainloader stanza to my grub.conf here on /dev/sda1 that
will cause it to reload grub from /dev/sdb1.
Is anything missing?
Two things. Confirmation that there really is a GRUB in /dev/sdb1's boot
sector and not in /dev/sdb's MBR. And you forgot to show what you added
to your F10's grub.conf.
1. I told it to put it in the MBR.
That would be /dev/sdb = (hd1) and not /dev/sdb1 = (hd1,0).
The string 'GRUB' exists in the MBR, but
there was a grub 2 install there prior from a mint8 install.
2.:
#26
title Fedora 12 64 bit from sdb by chainloading
rootnoverify (hd1,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1
The comment is wrong. It tries to chainload /dev/sdb1 not the MBR.
The "makeactive" or "makeactive 1" typically is not necessary.
Do you see (hd1) in your F10's /boot/grub/device.map?
And what does /boot/grub/device.map on /dev/sdb1 contain?
order, all bootable disks are listed in sata jack order, skipping the
Terrabyte drive I use for amanda.
Thanks Michael.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President
should on no account be allowed to do the job."
- Some wisdom from The Book.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- References:
- chainloader +1, again
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: chainloader +1, again
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: chainloader +1, again
- From: Michael Schwendt
- chainloader +1, again
- Prev by Date: Re: chainloader +1, again
- Next by Date: Re: AppArmor about to be merged into the kernel?
- Previous by thread: Re: chainloader +1, again
- Next by thread: Re: chainloader +1, again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|