Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:30:29 +1030
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:32 +0000, Thufir wrote:
From the post I was responding to, though, I infer that one cannot
upgrade without re-installing (at least, reliably). I'll have to
check the documentation. Wasn't that the "churn"?
The churn (change/turn) being the constant turning over, from one thing
to another, whatever it was, and however you did it. Upgrade or
re-install, it's still churning. The more annoying aspect of churn is
how rapidly you had to go through it.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Konstantin Svist
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- References:
- Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Antonio Olivares
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Robin Laing
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Thufir
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Konstantin Svist
- Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- From: Thufir
- Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: latest kernel boots to a blank screen
- Next by Date: Re: chainloader +1, again
- Previous by thread: Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Rolling Release Model(s), Fedora Discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
