Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:29:51 +0800
On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binarynut@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
WUSB600N.
That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 .
FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know, and didn't make the
claim that the WUSB600N has a rt2860 chipset.
My responses were solely directed towards indicating that if one did
have a RaLink RT2860 I felt it better to use the rpmfusion packages as
opposed to trying to compile the staging stuff.
If you can believe what you read on the net, :-), the v1 is rt2860 based
while the v2 is rt3572 based.
http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Wireless-Adapters/Is-the-chipset-of-WUSB600N-v1-different-from-WUSB600N-v2/m-p/314181
is one source.
--
Q: Why don't lawyers go to the beach? A: The cats keep trying to bury
them. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: binarynut
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- References:
- Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: binarynut
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: JD
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: JD
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- From: binarynut
- Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- Prev by Date: Re: HTML mail [was Re: FEL was Re: Hi]
- Next by Date: Re: HTML mail [was Re: FEL was Re: Hi]
- Previous by thread: Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- Next by thread: Re: Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2
- Index(es):