Re: SELinux
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:40:53 +1030
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 01:37 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
I see no need for SELinux on what is, while potentially multi user,
essentially single user system. I run behind two (count 'em) two
hardware firewalls both of them doing NAT. I've never had one,
not even one, IP tables violation.
You're only thinking of problems due to incoming networking connections.
That's only a small part of the equation.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: SELinux
- References:
- SELinux
- From: Kostas Sfakiotakis
- Re: SELinux
- From: Tim
- Re: SELinux
- From: Kostas Sfakiotakis
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- SELinux
- Prev by Date: Re: SELinux
- Next by Date: Re: SELinux
- Previous by thread: Re: SELinux
- Next by thread: Re: SELinux
- Index(es):