Re: SELinux
- From: Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:31:38 -0800
On 01/21/2011 09:50 AM, Mike McCarty wrote:
If you mean that he is vulnerable to attacks, and then
his machine harbors possibly malicious code w/o his knowledge,
then you are blaming the victim.
IMO, an unsecured computer on the net is just as much of an attractive
nuisance as a swimming pool that's not properly fenced in and the owner
is just as liable for any damage.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SELinux
- From: Alan Peery
- Re: SELinux
- References:
- SELinux
- From: Kostas Sfakiotakis
- Re: SELinux
- From: Tim
- Re: SELinux
- From: Kostas Sfakiotakis
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: SELinux
- From: Tim
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: SELinux
- From: Tim
- Re: SELinux
- From: Kostas Sfakiotakis
- Re: SELinux
- From: Tim
- Re: SELinux
- From: Mike McCarty
- SELinux
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?
- Next by Date: Howto import Address Book from Thunderbird to Claw-mail
- Previous by thread: Re: SELinux
- Next by thread: Re: SELinux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|