Re: SELinux

On 21 Jan 2011, at 23:31, Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
IMO, an unsecured computer on the net is just as much of an attractive
nuisance as a swimming pool that's not properly fenced in and the owner
is just as liable for any damage.

Your analogy is flawed, as pools are not generally able to conduct remote attacks once compromised. That's why unsecured computers are bad.

On a complete side note, perhaps those worried about unfenced pools should consider keeping a closer eye on the things dear to them that might fall in.

users mailing list
To unsubscribe or change subscription options: