Re: iptables and NAT
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:21:46 +1030
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:27 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
I surprised that this kind of things/action can be take by the ISP
Over here, in Australia...
Some ISPs block port 80 by default, though you may enable it. I seem to
recall that was an ISP-reaction to a worm.
Some ISPs block port 80, unless you pay extra for a business account.
Partially as a way for them to get more money out of you, partially
because their usual consumer configuration is designed more for traffic
flowing in the other direction.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: iptables and NAT [SOLVED]
- From: Jatin K
- Re: iptables and NAT [SOLVED]
- References:
- iptables and NAT
- From: Jatin K
- Re: iptables and NAT
- From: Tim
- Re: iptables and NAT
- From: Jatin K
- Re: iptables and NAT
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: iptables and NAT
- From: Jatin K
- iptables and NAT
- Prev by Date: how to change nautilus' default browser?
- Next by Date: Re: Libre Office on F14x64?
- Previous by thread: Re: iptables and NAT
- Next by thread: Re: iptables and NAT [SOLVED]
- Index(es):