Re: FEDORA and RHEL

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
If you want cutting edge go Fedora, if you want stable go RHEL. If you have
better things to do with your time than upgrade twice a year, RHEL and bug fixes
only.

You answered the OPs question directly and much better than my reply.

James McKenzie
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fedora vs RedHat
    ... But read the list of bug fixes in the updates to understand why you really don't want to upgrade anything important until after about 6 months after a release. ... course by the time it gets released there has been some time for RHEL to have pushed updates for anything drastically wrong, and RHEL is pretty well tested before release anyway. ... Even at that point they have had more QA than anything in fedora. ... There were some bugs in 5.0 but not the machine-crashing kind on any of the machines where I installed it. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Domain of sender address does not resolve ?
    ... has is deadly, and the bug fixes are not universally expressed, but it ... the kernel is a halfway recent RHEL 4 ... update kernel. ... though he should be fine with a recent RHEL sendmail rpm ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)