Re: nspluginwrapper



On 04/22/2011 06:17 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
<>

Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as
<>

With nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in separate processes.
<>

ahhh. yes. you refreshed the brain cells. [should stick this time] this
was discussed in a 'support-firefox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' thread last year.

Presumably, this also means that the plugins can run on separate
hardware threads¹: whether this makes any difference to browser
responsiveness is something I have neither investigated nor seen anyone
else investigate.

one would think so. this ability was not discussed.

--

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines