Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: g <geleem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:02:58 +0000
On 04/22/2011 06:17 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
<>
Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as<>
With nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in separate processes.<>
ahhh. yes. you refreshed the brain cells. [should stick this time] this
was discussed in a 'support-firefox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' thread last year.
Presumably, this also means that the plugins can run on separate
hardware threads¹: whether this makes any difference to browser
responsiveness is something I have neither investigated nor seen anyone
else investigate.
one would think so. this ability was not discussed.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- References:
- nspluginwrapper
- From: JD
- Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: g
- Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: JD
- Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: g
- Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: JD
- Re: nspluginwrapper
- From: James Wilkinson
- nspluginwrapper
- Prev by Date: Re: dhcpd gateway settings
- Next by Date: Re: nspluginwrapper
- Previous by thread: Re: nspluginwrapper
- Next by thread: Re: nspluginwrapper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|