Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: JD <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:05 -0700
On 05/13/11 11:47, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 07:02 -0700, JD wrote:Good question. I hope a developer familiar with
since pulseaudio allows multiple audio clients,One thing I haven't seen mentioned is how pulseaudio handles multiple
you will have quiet an orchestra of sound when
answering mutiple incoming voip calls and asnwer
all of them at the same time (roughly speaking) :)
sound capture devices.
Does it handle them as well as it handles multiple sound generating
applications? (Yes, that's a leading question.)
pulseaudio internals will proffer some insights.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- References:
- Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Marko Vojinovic
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Fernando Cassia
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Zoltan Hoppar
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Rick Sewill
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Zoltan Hoppar
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Zoltan Hoppar
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Dmitri Bachtin
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Tim
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Michael Hennebry
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: JD
- Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- From: Tim
- Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- Prev by Date: Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- Next by Date: Yum conflicts and packaging question
- Previous by thread: Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- Next by thread: Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
- Index(es):