Re: Protected WLAN
- From: Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:01:53 +0100
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 06:04:49 JD wrote:
On 05/17/11 21:15, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
I'm waiting for the next level new security that is unbreakable before
buying my next new home wireless router. B^)
I do not think there is one, nor will there be one
(for public use).
The gov would not allow it's dissemination, and
for good reason: can you imagine how easily it
would be taken advantage of by criminals to
cause damage? Perhaps there already are so
called "ubreakable" methods being used by
criminals, spies, ...etc. I don't really know.
Please keep in mind that this holds only for USA and a couple of other
countries. As for the rest of the world, developing strong wireless encryption
algorithms is not illegal, and they will probably be developed and implemented
in the future.
All the "allowed" methods that you can access,
download and use, can be easily broken
by the gov/nsa.
Except for skype, of course... ;-) But that's old news. And now that Microsoft
took it over, they will probably trade with the nsa for a backdoor... :-)
Best, :-)
Marko
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- [OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN
- From: Rick Sewill
- [OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN
- References:
- Protected WLAN
- From: Misha Shnurapet
- Re: Protected WLAN
- From: Kevin J. Cummings
- Re: Protected WLAN
- From: JD
- Protected WLAN
- Prev by Date: Netstat Ouput - Where?
- Next by Date: [OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN
- Previous by thread: Re: Protected WLAN
- Next by thread: [OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN
- Index(es):