Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- From: Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:10:55 -0400
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:36:16 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:47:22 -0400,
Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anyone happen to know the magic voo-doo I must have
missed to get decent video from the catalyst drivers, or
am I doomed to using Windows 7 if I want both audio and
video at the same time :-).
HDMI support already exists for r600/r700 based cards.
The following commit seems relevant:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=805c22168da76a65c978017d0fe0d59cd048e995
It indicates that audio is disabled by default because of problems on some
systems. You can add radeon.audio=1 to the boot parameters to try to turn
it back on.
Dueling bugzillas! This says there is no support for my card at all:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34782
hdmi audio is not supported yet on evergreen and northern islands asics.
Statements like that always bring up the question in my mind: How the
heck does anyone know what all these code names for chip sets are and
which ones are used on which products? :-).
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- References:
- Radeon versus Catalyst
- From: Tom Horsley
- Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Radeon versus Catalyst
- Prev by Date: ruby 1.9
- Next by Date: Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- Previous by thread: Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- Next by thread: Re: Radeon versus Catalyst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|