Re: telnet on local LAN question

On 8/18/2011 9:49 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:


Your earlier email indicates that to solve the mail/mailx between
machines, I need comment out that line in sendmail.mc and I will get
the results you indicated. Sure worth a try, let me give it a go.

Craig:

I comment out the 127.0.0.1 line in sendmail.mc as suggested, did a
service sendmail restart

I added a line in access for "Connect:192.168.2 RELAY" to match the
format of the existing entries. All the other entries were Relay and so
were all the online docs I could find.

I did this on two machines (sender and receiver)

I did a mail from one machine to another and got a "No route to host".

I then did a service iptables stop and tried again ... got a "Connection
refused"

Netstat -an | grep 25 gives me the same output as your email shows.
Iptables -L also gives me the same output.

Either I missed something in your email(s) or I am back to the concern
that "I am doing what I should do but something is blocking" ... which
is what I am trying to sort out with the telnet test.

If you need attachments / output from my system, let me know and I will
forward.

If I am taking up too much of your bandwidth I will understand if you
bail on this. I feel like I might be in over my head (aka: dense) and
I'm just not getting it

Thanks,
Paul

ps: I hope there are no typos in this or my tests ... I double-checked
but my track record isn't that good
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DST Updates Deployed via Group Policy
    ... In KB914387 Microsoft gives you the registry keys that need to be changed ... saw that my EST reg entries were the same as my 2003 server and 2000 ... WAS able to select the group in the GPO editor so I assumed that it could ... things are working, that is, the machines are being healthy little ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.group_policy)
  • Re: IP Addresses and netmask
    ... The "quick and dirty" way is to just clear out all the WINS entries in the ... I think DNS will take care of itself without bothering it, ... Controllers and DNS machines. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: registry cleaner
    ... removing such entries. ... I see a marked improvement in performance and boot up time, ... Dozens and dozens of machines. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: problems with replication
    ... I am trying to get to the bottom of a few replication issues we are having ... As you can see the entries without a site\server name are way out. ... machines back online if this is the case. ... Harj Singh ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Port 138 traffic sent to non-existant servers (XP Pro machines only)
    ... locations has several xp pro machines. ... (they hit the firewall because these servers used to be ... The servers they are trying to reach did exist at one ... ensure there are no entries for these servers and there ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)