Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- From: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:28:54 +0100
Why LXDE instead of XFCE? Just curious...
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Christopher Svanefalk <
christopher.svanefalk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe this might have come up earlier, but I would like to once again--
encourage all those users who are reluctant about making the leap from Gnome
2 to Gnome 3 (now that the end of the maintenance cycle for F14 is rapidly
approaching) to take a good look at LXDE. I installed it for the first time
ever today, installed Compiz, fiddled around, and eventually got more or
less back to the workflow I had under Gnome 2.
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- From: nomnex
- Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- References:
- LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- Prev by Date: Re: F15: turnin off uneeded services
- Next by Date: Re: [Fedora] Re: itunes-like applications
- Previous by thread: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- Next by thread: Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|