Re: Comparitive Desktop Environments

Ok, I tried XFCE. I find it far superior to LXDE. You can find things in
a reasonable fashion. It shares with LXDE the problem of not being able
to change the backgrounds. I think people who balk at Gnome 3 would find
it easy to use. Adding things to the panel are much easier than with
LXDE. I am a little confused with Mixer as Volume control but such is

I agree with this above assessment, even though I am currently an LXDE

LXDE, however, satisfies my requirements, and I don't mind having to
find stuff, or programming it through configuration files. It appears
to be more of a cross between a full-blown DE and a WM-environment. (I
am a late migrant from fvwm through XFCE to LXDE.) Of some concern is
the fact that one of the LXDE components (lxpanel) is currently

There have been quite a bit of discussion on the web on the pluses and
the minuses of Gnome3. I have not used it, and do not intend to. I used
fvwm for a long time (from 1998 to 2007) when I gave up on it, and
moved to XFCE which I used for another couple of years until LXDE came
around. (On the way from fvwm to XFCE, I spent time on Gnome2 -- or
whatever it was in 2009 -- for one day, and promptly gave it up because
I did not feel it added to much for me.)

I have fond feelings for fvwm, however I moved simply because many of
the applications in Fedora would increasingly have needless (some
still do) gnome dependencies. (I think they have done a better job
cleaning it up some.) In fact, to me, the real discussion should
be not on the pluses and minuses of Gnome2 vs 3, but whether the base
distribution should be so tied in so deeply to something so radical.
(Note that libnotify does not work in F15 as a result to changes in the
base package, or so I have been led to believe. Yes, there is a
workaround, install xfce4-notifyd, but this is some strange solution if
you do not want a XFCE spin.) I happen to believe not, but maybe there
can be other views of this.

Of greater appeal to some, including me, would be if there could be a
Fedora spin using a non-desktop environment such as fvwm (or something
similar). That would be quite beneficial to at least some of us users
welded to the past...:-)

Many thanks and best wishes,

users mailing list
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A lot of problems with debian sid on a Notebook
    ... and do not want to even install new softwares. ... In second, you have desktops like XFCE and LXDE, which are more like ... I agree that nothing is as top-heavy as KDE 4 and GNOME 3. ...
  • Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
    ... The first time I tried XFCE, the rat and the ugly font logo, the ... XFCE made me feel the poor Gnome2 brother, ... Then I tried LXDE. ... than GUI environment, but the trade off between the learning curve vs. ...
  • Re: Goodbye GNOME, Hello XFCE
    ... I'm testing KDE4 again and you can't compare it to Xfce ... reading and tweaking to use it as a replacement for Xfce and LXDE. ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
  • Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2
    ... On my old hardware, ... I'm using the Gnome 3 fallback mode on F15, ... I suspect the same would be true of LXDE or XFCE. ...
  • Re: I think we need a discussion
    ... I salute you for your perseverance in sticking to FVWM. ... to keep track of these new daemons. ... I have found both XFCE and LXDE to be fairly adequate for my needs. ... evolved product if some distribution had adopted it as its default. ...