Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:18:31 +0100
O> > It's not a tool to prevent deliberate attack by users, and its not
100% effective against a very careful attacker but tht doesn't make it
nothing to do with security.
I'd say the fact that it *cannot* be used to "secure" a system, means
that it does have nothing to do with security. There is no way, shape,
In which case there is no such thing as 'security' because if 500 US
marines with automatic weapons crash through your windows your security
model fails.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
- References:
- doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Paul Allen Newell
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Tim
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Dave Ihnat
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Paul Allen Newell
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Tim
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Greg Woods
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Tim
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- From: Tim
- doc question on private network IP allocation
- Prev by Date: Re: imac on lan, printing to f14: network host '192.168.2.8' is busy, will retry in 30 seconds
- Next by Date: Turning Off GNOME Warnings
- Previous by thread: Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- Next by thread: Re: doc question on private network IP allocation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|