Re: grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
- From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:19:36 +0200
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
<mikes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just did an update and it included a new kernel, but then on
reboot after running grub2-mkconfig noticed that the newest one
was not first. Seems to be sorting the 9 before the 10?
Is this a bug?
I use the default="0", so this makes it not use the latest?
Looks like a bug in mkconfig's sorting code. [1]
Simply replace sort -n (numerical) with sort -V (version) in
grub-mkconfig_lib (patch attach, run from "/", use at your own risk,
may eat your children, etc)
I've reported it in bugzilla [2].
- Gilboa
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2012-03/msg00159.html
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804558
--- usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib.old 2012-03-19 10:57:20.568836288 +0200
+++ usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib 2012-03-19 10:57:25.951592474 +0200
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
a="$b"
b="$c"
fi
- if (echo "$a" ; echo "$b") | sort -n | head -n 1 | grep -qx "$b" ; then
+ if (echo "$a" ; echo "$b") | sort -V | head -n 1 | grep -qx "$b" ; then
return 0
else
return 1
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
- References:
- grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
- From: Michael D. Setzer II
- grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
- Prev by Date: Re: Blocked Ports
- Next by Date: Re: Blocked Ports
- Previous by thread: Re: grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
- Next by thread: Re: grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
